Feasibility study of a geothermal application for a small brewing plant
Client: Azienda Agricola Mirri Piana s.s.
Location: Castel San Pietro Terme (BO), Italy
Date: 2016
The study is aimed to assess the feasibility of geothermal energy systems for satisfying the thermal energy demand of a small brewing plant.
Project Goals
- Renewable energy supply for brewing plant thermal loads
- Finding the best geothermal application from the technical-economic point of view
Activities Performed
- Gathering of hydrogeological and temperature data of the area;
- Analysis of the thermal loads (heating and cooling) needed for the brewing process;
- Preliminary design of different geothermal systems;
- Preliminary economic analysis of the different solutions.
Technical data
Operating mode: chilling, heating & cooling
Solution analysed: hybrid solution coupling geothermal / air heat pumps
Chilling power: 7.5 kWt
Heating & cooling power: 6 kWt
Brewing process phases considered: fermentation, maturation, offices heating and cooling
Phases working temperatures: fermentation +3°C, maturation -5°C, H&C +20°C
Technical feasibility
The feasibility study led to the design of a non conventional heating/cooling system using ground source heat pump coupled with air heat pumps, and to the identification of the best solution from a technical and economic point of view.
The use of in-house developed software allowed for a proper geoexchange system design.
The analysis of different technological solutions provided detailed information about projects with different investment costs and return periods.
Geoexchange system with borehole heat exchangers (BHE)
- Number of wells: 4
- Spacing (m): 8
- Depth (m): 100
Geoexchange system with open loop application
- Number of wells: 1
- Depth (m): 100
Geoexchange system with geothermal spirals
- Number of spirals: 15
- Spacing (m): 4
- Depth (m): 3
- Diameter (m): 0.4
Geoexchange system with geothermal baskets
- Number of baskets: 8
- Spacing (m): 4
- Depth (m): 2
- Diameter (m): 1.9
Economic Feasibility
The different geothermal solutions were compared with an air heat pump alternative solution and the break even point was found.
Type of geothermal solution | Investment (€) | Break even point (y) |
Open loop | 45.500 | ~16 |
Closed loop | 35.100 | >20 |
Spirals | 17.400 | 10 |
Baskets | 20.200 | ~15 |